Posted on: September 09, 2013in Case Studies
Second Requests - The D4 Difference
Five million documents needed to be collected, reviewed and produced in 10 days.
An AmLaw100 firm was retained by their client, a multi-national Fortune 500 company, to help complete a response to a Hart-Scott-Rodino Second Request* from the Department of Justice. D4 was engaged by the firm to support the Second Request eDiscovery process.
The proposed merger could not go forward until the second request was completed, pressuring the team to collect, review and produce the responsive materials as quickly as possible. Five million documents were collected (1.6TB of data) and the firm had 10 days until production. To make it even more complicated, this included translation and review of foreign language documents.
D4’s Data Operations Group and Discovery
Engineering Team worked with the firm’s
staff to identify large chunks of data that were
clearly not responsive. The D4 team was also
able to identify patterns of data that were not
responsive and removed them from the review
set. Over 1.6TB of data was reduced by over
40% before processing, utilizing advanced data
analysis and reduction techniques.
D4 was then able to process and image potentially responsive data for deeper review in Relativity. D4 deployed the necessary operational and project management resources that were required to support such a large data set with a ten-day turnaround.
The law firm was able to meet the DOJ
production specifications and finished in ten
days, thereby meeting the DOJ deadlines,
as well as saving the client time and money.
The DOJ made no material objections to
the ultimate document production and the
transaction successfully closed as planned.
* In United States antitrust law, a second request (under
the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of
1976) is a discovery procedure by which the Federal Trade
Commission and the Antitrust Division of the Department
of Justice investigate corporate mergers and acquisitions
which may have anti-competitive consequences.
A typical second request asks to gather information about
the sales, facilities, assets, and structure of the businesses
which are party to the transaction.
D4 Weekly eDiscovery Outlook
Power your eDiscovery intellect with our weekly newsletter.
Posted April 21, 2017
American Bar Association Section of International Law | 2017 Spring Meeting in Washington DC
Posted April 19, 2017
Office 365 Enterprise E5: 6 Features That Could Benefit Your Business
Posted April 12, 2017
Data Reuse in eDiscovery: 4 Questions to Help Start Your Policy
Posted April 05, 2017
ESI Data Mapping Basics for eDiscovery
Posted March 30, 2017
China’s Cybersecurity Law: Objectives, Compliance and Business Recommendations
Posted March 28, 2017
What will the future bring for the legal industry? | Q&A
Posted March 23, 2017
Beginner’s Guide to Litigation Response Planning and Execution
Posted March 16, 2017
7 Best Practices for a Defensible Legal Hold Process
Posted March 10, 2017
BYOD Privacy: 6 Considerations to Protect Your Business
Posted March 08, 2017
3 Benefits of Managed Review