Posted on: September 10, 2013in Case Studies
Predictive Coding as a Strategic Weapon
A large consumer manufacturing company and its outside counsel hired D4 to assist them in defending a false advertising and intellectual property claim from another manufacturer in the same consumer electronics industry.
Our customer and its legal team felt it strategic to meet the existing deadline although the document population increased by a factor of ten. Outside counsel wanted to leverage the completed coding for the initial five custodians; the corporate customer wanted to keep to the original budget. In short: same deadline and budget for ten times the number of documents.
Read how D4's innovative team of experts thought of an outside-of-the-box solution in order to satisfy both parties and placed our client in an advantageous position with the magistrate judge.
D4 Weekly eDiscovery Outlook
Power your eDiscovery intellect with our weekly newsletter.
Posted November 16, 2017
5 Workflow Tips for Conducting a Foreign Language Review
Posted November 10, 2017
What You Need to Know About Managed Review and the eDiscovery Process
Posted November 02, 2017
7 Steps to Help You Defensibly Migrate eDiscovery Data
Posted October 27, 2017
CLE Webinar with Lewis Brisbois: How to Do Social Media Collection and Presentation Right
Posted October 26, 2017
Despite Clawback, Defendant’s Reckless Abandon of Rule 502 Bites Back
Posted October 20, 2017
How to Use the eDiscovery PST Export Tool in Office 365 E3
Posted October 12, 2017
Recent eDiscovery Cases for Mobile Phones and Social Media
Posted October 05, 2017
Raising Objections to the Format of ESI Productions: Do it Early and Do it Clearly
Posted September 27, 2017
5 Reasons eDiscovery Alternative Fee Models Make Sense for You
Posted September 22, 2017
Why it's Crucial to Have a Corporate Mobile Device Policy