Posted on: October 25, 2013in White Papers
Contracting Away Discovery Obligations: Is it Possible? Is it Advisable?
This whitepaper will take a closer look at the pros and cons of using contractual agreements to limit certain aspects of eDiscovery.
The most direct way to achieve predictability and, as a by-product, manage costs, would be to limit discovery, and specifically, eDiscovery. But is this allowed by court rules, opinions, or other oversight sources?
For example, can parties set limits on the number of custodians or servers that can be collected, specify acceptable retention and preservation procedures, or bar imposition of sanctions in situations of accidental misconduct?
D4 Weekly eDiscovery Outlook
Power your eDiscovery intellect with our weekly newsletter.
Posted January 18, 2018
5 Expert Predictions for the eDiscovery Industry in 2018
Posted January 17, 2018
Get Your Passport to GDPR Success - LegalTech New York 2018
Posted January 11, 2018
Is Your Organization Vulnerable to a Cyber Attack? 3 Steps to Put Your Mind at Ease
Posted January 04, 2018
How the EU and China Plan to Deal with Multinational Data
Posted December 28, 2017
How to Navigate International Data Privacy Laws for eDiscovery
Posted December 21, 2017
Cross-Border eDiscovery: An Introduction to Cultural and Legal Obstacles
Posted December 14, 2017
Webinar Q&A Featuring Panelists from Special Counsel and Brainspace
Posted November 30, 2017
Help Your Employees Find the Information They Need with Machine Learning
Posted November 22, 2017
How to Use Managed and Prioritized Workflows to Reduce the Cost of Review [On-Demand Webinar]
Posted November 16, 2017
5 Workflow Tips for Conducting a Foreign Language Review