Near-Duplicate Detection Finds Documents No One Thought Could be Found
Expert consultants (inexpensively) apply analytics to find documents that would not have been found through traditional review and client saves $134,955. Legal teams often come across important documents from third-party sources or other matters requiring a content comparison in order to identify similar or duplicate documents within their client’s ESI. In...
How to Deal with a Document Dump and Save $1.4M Using Predictive Coding [Case Study]
The Case In this case, opposing counsel produced more than 800,000 documents (267GB) to D4’s client. Their client suspected that this was a “document dump,” i.e., a production purposely designed to make it harder to find relevant information. The collection produced was based on keyword searches that both parties had ag...
Using Advanced Technologies and Solutions to Cut Costs Significantly
Company Saves Hundreds of Thousands of Dollars on eDiscovery Review Using Advanced Technologies. Situation A major healthcare company, with operations in more than 100 countries, was involved in a contract dispute which the General Counsel of Litigation described as a “high costs/low merits” case. Challenge Due to these circumstances, there exis...
Predictive Coding as a Strategic Weapon
Situation A large consumer manufacturing company and its outside counsel hired D4 to assist them in defending a false advertising and intellectual property claim from another manufacturer in the same consumer electronics industry. Challenge Our customer and its legal team felt it strategic to meet the existing deadline although the...
Second Requests - The D4 Difference
Five million documents needed to be collected, reviewed and produced in 10 days. Situation An AmLaw100 firm was retained by their client, a multi-national Fortune 500 company, to help complete a response to a Hart-Scott-Rodino Second Request* from the Department of Justice. D4 was engaged by the firm to support the Second...
EDRM in a Week - The D4 Difference
Situation A leading law firm takes 18 TB through the EDRM in 7 days and realizes a 98% data reduction. D4 collaborated with their client and the project was broken into two phases:Phase 1 - Sample Set and Phase 2 - Complete Set. Challenge The courts mandated the discovery and review of data contained o...
D4 Weekly eDiscovery Outlook
Power your eDiscovery intellect with our weekly newsletter.
Posted May 17, 2017
How to Comply with 21 CFR and HIPAA Data Retention Requirements
Posted May 11, 2017
4 Key Advantages of Conducting Remote Depositions
Posted May 03, 2017
eDiscovery in International Dispute Resolution: What Experts Want You to Know
Posted April 27, 2017
China Expands Data Transfer Requirements for its Cybersecurity Law
Posted April 26, 2017
How to Use Office 365 Advanced eDiscovery to Prioritize Your Review
Posted April 21, 2017
American Bar Association Section of International Law | 2017 Spring Meeting in Washington DC
Posted April 19, 2017
Office 365 Enterprise E5: 6 Features That Could Benefit Your Business
Posted April 12, 2017
Data Reuse in eDiscovery: 4 Questions to Help Start Your Policy
Posted April 05, 2017
ESI Data Mapping Basics for eDiscovery
Posted March 30, 2017
China’s Cybersecurity Law: Objectives, Compliance and Business Recommendations